Saturday, December 17, 2011

Should there be new legislation making it mandatory for AIDS victims to get a bio-hazard tattoo?

I think anyone diagnosed with AIDS should be required to get a bio-hazard tattoo just above their genitalia. Do you think such legislation could ever be passed? Why or why not? Thanks :)|||No





What you are suggesting would end up being cruel and unusual punishment for something that may not have been in their control.





Would it be passed in the US? Extremely doubtful.|||Why not just "I have AIDS" tattooed above there genitals?|||I think your approach was tried in Germany in the 40's. Did not work out so well.|||that's an idea..............I have another one.............why not tattoo on peoples foreheads that if their IQ is below normal........have their score on their forehead....what do you think?|||Nein, Mein Fruend! Right to privacy under the HIPAA should NOT be compromised to make Homophobes and National Socialists feel good.





I do agree that people infected with any STD MUST be required by law to reveal their STD status to potential partners. In the 80s, Gay rights activists got many states to remove HIV/ AIDs from the individual State(s) List of Infectious Diseases and thus an infected person could NOT be forced to divulge partners ort be forced to refrain from unprotected sex.





and


BTW the act of Tattooing an AIDS victim (YES, VICTIM) would unnecessarily expose the Tattoo artist, their equipment and others to HIV/AIDS.





edit: Yeah they replace needles, but what about the OTHER equipment used?


As they used to say about hair gel, "A little dab will do you!"


you may have said victim but You are making their Malady sound like a criminal act!

No comments:

Post a Comment